Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I ran your IQFeed DDE vs. my broker vs. a level II window for some slow-moving options. I would see the level II quote change, then your feed update instantaneously. My broker's DDE, however, would take as much as 30 seconds to update. I am not chasing milliseconds, but half a minute is unacceptable." - Comment from Rob
"With HUGE volume on AAPL and RIMM for 2 days, everyone in a trading room was whining about freezes, crashes and lag with *******, RealTick, TS and Cyber. InvestorRT with IQFeed was rock solid. I mean SOLID!" - Comment from Public IRC Chat
"I like you guys better than *******...much more stable and a whole lot fewer issues." - Comment from Philip
"Excellent datafeed !!!" - Comment from Arely
"I use IQ Feed, Great stuff as far as data analysis information, storage and retrieval is concerned." - Comment from Public Forum
"I am enjoying the feed very much - so superior to the broker provided feed I was previously using." - Comment from George
"You have an excellent product !!!!!!" - Comment from Arely
"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »IQFeed Datafeed Wish List »ping
Author Topic: ping (3 messages, Page 1 of 1)

laughlin
-Interested User-
Posts: 24
Joined: Aug 3, 2005


Posted: Dec 7, 2005 11:14 AM          Msg. 1 of 3
Speaking of spoofing time stamps, it would sure be helpful to ping the local DTN IQFeed pgm via sockets and get something similar to a timestamp. No bandwidth to your server. How about it?

Terry Laughlin

DTN_Jay_Froscheiser
-VP, Product Operations-
Posts: 1746
Joined: May 3, 2004

DTN IQFeed/DTN.IQ/DTN NxCore


Posted: Dec 7, 2005 11:21 AM          Msg. 2 of 3
Can you elaborate a bit on your needs here. I take it you aren't looking for a timestamp specifically, rather than some kind of message to show that IQ is alive? If this is the case, could you use the S,REQUEST STATS message which will give you essentially all the information provided on the IQConnect manager screen (including market time, which still won't have second resolution).

Jay Froscheiser
DTN - Trading Markets

laughlin
-Interested User-
Posts: 24
Joined: Aug 3, 2005


Posted: Dec 7, 2005 01:17 PM          Msg. 3 of 3
Because Windows is threaded, mainstream work may be concurrent with receipt of the updates from IQFeed. To properly mix my work with updates from IQFeed, it would be nice to have coordinating function. In a realtime environment, this is easy in a number of ways. In a non-realtime environment, it is tricky/hard/difficult/impossible.

Therefore, by pinging IQFeed, I can react to the response regardless of other traffic. To work, it must come in on the port that I sent to. For watches, it must come mixed with other watch traffic on the same port. The local part of IQFeed does not have to communicate with the server to meet my needs, just answer the ping.

As you can see from another post, I am simulating this with a force summary message, but the overhead seems a bit high and my coding is a bit obscure as I have to tell my fakes from real fundamental/summary messages.

Ideal would be that I ping(echo) IQFEED with an argument, such as: eARG\r\n

IQFEED responds with: E,ARG\r\n

or 95% of that would be: e\r\n

with a response of: E\r\n

From my point of view, the time stamp is a nice superfluosity. Oh, the actual syntax is irrelevant. The choice to a ping all the way to the server might be nice, but is irrelevant to me.

Terry Laughlin
 

 

Time: Thu May 2, 2024 11:40 PM CFBB v1.2.0 12 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003