Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
"I had always used ******* but for the past 2 weeks have been trying DTN IQFeed. Customer support has been extraordinary. They call just to make sure your problem hasn't recurred." - Comment from Public Forum
"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I was on the phone with a friend who uses CQG and right after the Fed announcement, CQG was as much as 30 seconds behind DTN.IQ. Some quotes were off by as much as 15-18 cents. Your feed never missed a beat." - Comment from Roger
"It’s so nice to be working with real professionals!" - Comment from Len
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"If someone needs the best quality data and backfill beyond what their broker provides at a rate that is the best in the industry, I highly recommend IQFeed." - Comment from Josh via Public Forum
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »IQFeed Developer Support »Average Volume field in fundamental data
Author Topic: Average Volume field in fundamental data (4 messages, Page 1 of 1)

altmany
-Interested User-
Posts: 73
Joined: Jul 30, 2018

IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector


Posted: Sep 27, 2019 07:55 AM          Msg. 1 of 4
What is the units of the Average Volume field in the Fundamental data message (http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/Level1FundamentalMessage.cfm)? is it shares or USD? is it the nominal value or specified in thousands/millions?

This question chimes with a similar recent query on this forum (http://forums.iqfeed.net/index.cfm?page=topic&topicID=5615), where it was not clear whether the Common Shares Outstanding field is the nominal value or specified in thousands (the latter, in this case).

I therefore suggest adding a <Units> column to the table in the documentation webpage, to make things clearer to users, for these data fields as well as all the others.

Yair Altman
IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector
https://UndocumentedMatlab.com/IQML

I am not a DTN employee; my post reflects my personal opinion

DTN_Gary_Stephen
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 396
Joined: Jul 3, 2019


Posted: Oct 7, 2019 03:43 PM          Msg. 2 of 4
We are discussing making an update to this effect. Adding units for clarity is a good idea, but we want to do it for all columns that might benefit from it.

Sincerely,
Gary Stephen
DTN IQFeed Implementation Support Specialist

Roberts
-Interested User-
Posts: 53
Joined: Mar 26, 2008


Posted: Aug 15, 2020 05:04 AM          Msg. 3 of 4
I'm looking at fundamental fields for the first time (and trying to find a forum thread that discusses the field order because it dertainly doesn't correlate to the table given at /api/docs/Level1FundamentalMessage.cfm)

Anyway, for TSLA field 4 (starting from 0), which is supposed to be the "Average daily volume in 1000's of shares (4 week average)", returned 13022000. This is the currect value for shares traded (in 1's, not in 1000's).

DTN_Gary_Stephen
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 396
Joined: Jul 3, 2019


Posted: Aug 17, 2020 07:59 AM          Msg. 4 of 4
Are you specifying S,SET PROTOCOL 6.1? If not, you are using the default (older) protocol of 4.9. The default fields in the Fundamental Message differ, are in a different order, and may have different names in prior protocols. In this case, the field is the same, but 4.9 measured it in number of shares instead of 1000's of shares.

In general, you should always specify the latest protocol, unless you have backwards compatibility reasons for using an older one. (If you do, the page http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/ArchivedDocs.cfm links to documentation for previous protocols.)

A list of the fields in the Fundamental Message, order, and what they mean in Protocol 6.1 is at http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs//Level1FundamentalMessage.cfm. The fundamental message cannot be customized.

Sincerely,
Gary Stephen
DTN IQFeed Implementation Support Specialist
 

 

Time: Sun May 19, 2024 2:51 PM CFBB v1.2.0 9 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003