|
Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!
(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)
"After all the anxiety I had with my previous data provider it is a relief not to have to worry about data speed and integrity." - Comment from Eamonn
"Everything is working great ! Very impressive client. The news refreshes better and is more pertinent than the ******* feed I paid $ 100/month for. I Also like the charts a lot." - Comment from Leon
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
"And by the way, have to say this. I love the IQFeed software. It's rock solid and it has a really nice API." - Comment from Thomas via RT Chat
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I'm very glad I switched to IQFeed. It's working perfectly with no lag, even during fast market conditions." - Comment from Andy via Email
"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
"I'm satisfied with IQFeed. It's the most reliable and fastest quote feed I have ever used. Although I'm a resident in China, it's still very fast!" - Comment from Xiaofei
"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"I just wanted to let you know how fast and easy I found it to integrate IQFeed into our existing Java code using your JNI client. In my experience, such things almost never go so smoothly - great job!" - Comment from Nate
|
|
|
|
| Joined: |
Feb 15, 2024 01:27 PM |
| Last Post: |
Feb 20, 2024 11:30 AM |
| Last Visit: |
Feb 20, 2024 12:05 PM |
| Website: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Occupation: |
|
| Interests: |
|
|
|
lz has contributed to 2 posts out of 21194 total posts
(0.01%) in 92 days (0.02 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Thank you. Please let me know if the error can be clarified.
While processing older data history, I came across a case where instead of the date there was only a number 20:
2,@ES#,MD01,3210.25,3210.5,178,99,15:59:13.253701,20,52,15:59:13.223699,T,T,T,
For example, one of the previous messages before this one was as expected:
2,@ES#,MD01,3210.25,3210.5,177,99,15:59:13.187790,2020-07-28,52,15:59:13.223699,T,T,T,
as we can see, there is a date in the correct format: 2020-07-28.
Data were obtained using protocol 6.1. If I look at the documentation on L2 update message for protocol 6.1:
https://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/docs61/Level2UpdateSummaryMessage.cfm
There is a date format CCYY-MM-DD exactly at the position of the occurrence of the number 20.
Can you please correct me if I missed something in the documentation?
|
|
Home
Search
Register
Login
Recent Posts