Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I am a hedge fund manager here. It’s funny, I have a Bloomberg terminal and a Bridge feed, but I still like having my DTN feed!" - Comment from Feras
"With HUGE volume on AAPL and RIMM for 2 days, everyone in a trading room was whining about freezes, crashes and lag with *******, RealTick, TS and Cyber. InvestorRT with IQFeed was rock solid. I mean SOLID!" - Comment from Public IRC Chat
"I noticed that ******* quotes locked up shortly after the interest rate announcement yesterday while yours stayed stable." - Comment from Ron in Utah
"I have been using IQFeed now for a few years in MultiCharts and I have zero complaints. Very, very rare to have any data hiccups or anything at all go wrong." - Comment from Public Forum
"I had always used ******* but for the past 2 weeks have been trying DTN IQFeed. Customer support has been extraordinary. They call just to make sure your problem hasn't recurred." - Comment from Public Forum
"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email
"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
"I started a trial a few weeks back before the market went wild. DTN.IQ didn’t miss anything and beat my other provider. I decided to stay with you because of the great service through all the volatility." - Comment from Mike
"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: wpleasant
About Contact
Joined: Apr 16, 2012 02:51 PM
Last Post: Jan 26, 2016 12:21 PM
Last Visit: Jan 26, 2016 07:32 PM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
wpleasant has contributed to 3 posts out of 21196 total posts (0.01%) in 4,416 days (0.00 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Wish List » Trade Corrections & Cancellations Jan 26, 2016 12:21 PM (Total replies: 1)

I've discussed this with developer support recently but I thought a formal request in the forum may help things along.

Please send us trade Corrections & Cancellations. Without them any data grouped by tick or volume following an extra/incorrect trade is garbage or even dangerous. Even the derivative data calculated by iqconnect.exe would be incorrect without a fresh call.

My understanding is that the current workaround is monitoring the "Total Volume" for reductions and then calling HTT comparing some time span of trades to the historical lookup for the error...

Thanks,

William


Thanks for the reply,

I'm just now revisiting this and have noticed that millisecond time stamps start on 2012-12-24 for IBM and AAPL. Before the 24th the data appears to revert back to version <= 4.9. Is this consistent for all US equities and will the millisecond time stamps be back-filled to the full 120 days?


While working with protocol 5.0 I’ve noticed that the earliest available equity data (“IBM”,”SPY”,”AAPL”) I’ve been able to download using “HTT” starts on 2013-01-14. Is this something on my end or has the historical data not been backfilled?

Also, with level 1 update/ summary messages is it safe to assume that the “Current Update Field Names” will remain in the same order for the foreseeable future and that if any additional fields are added they would be appended on the end of the message?

Example messages from iqfeed after setting protocol to 5.0:

S,CURRENT PROTOCOL,5.0,
S,CURRENT UPDATE FIELDNAMES,Symbol,Most Recent Trade,Most Recent Trade Size,Most Recent Trade TimeMS,Most Recent Trade Market Center,Total Volume,Bid,Bid Size,Ask,Ask Size,Open,High,Low,Close,Message Contents,Most Recent Trade Conditions

Best regards,

William


Time: Sat May 18, 2024 6:15 AM CFBB v1.2.0 5 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003